devel@ntpsec.org said: >> Or maybe wait for the NTS RFC to come out so we have a good >> reason for the release. > What is the official (or barring that, consensus) view on the quality of NTS > in NTPsec? Is it something that is usable in production? If so, please cut a > release sooner rather than later. If it's still experimental, a release is > less critical.
I think the code is in good shape. I don't know of any reason not to use it in production. (aside from the normal growing pains, like #606) My comment was intended to suggest waiting for a big (1.2) release after doing a little release (1.1.7) soon. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
