On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:21 AM Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote: > You yourself advocated that Mode 6 ought to be replaced by an HTTP > service on TCP port 123. I think that's a good idea, if we can do > it. The problem is than NTS-KE *also* wants to have TCP 123.
Like Hal pointed out, ALPN makes this a non-issue. But what gave you the idea that NTS-KE wants 123/tcp? There's been some back-and-forth on this in the WG but I've been advocating against using 123 because NTS-KE is explicitly not specific to NTP and can be extended to provide similar negotiation mechanisms for other protocols. Regardless, it's just a number and makes no technical difference. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
