On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:52 PM Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote: > If you end up going with a non-123 port number, I requst that the RFC > allow use on other ports when and if ALPN is available and specify > the ALPN tag to be used.
The spec already mandates that ALPN always be used and allocates a tag with IANA. > I disagree. New firewall holes are difficult, practically if not > theoretically. tcp/123 is already a new firewall hole. If you want to work around unchangeable firewall rules you probably have to use 443 (and again rely on ALPN). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
