I'll post a rebuttal sometime later this week. As for IETF processes, though, you're years late. The WG already had a consensus call in 2016 on what NTS-KE's framing format should look like, and it was unanimous. You can still comment during IETF Last Call and try to convince the IESG to block the document from advancing, but you're not likely to be taken seriously there; the IETF publishes new binary protocols all the time.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:17 AM Eric S. Raymond via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote: > > This is why my design sketch for NTPv5 is a JSON profile, and wgy I > intend to file an objection to the KE protocol in the NTS draft. > > http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8254 > -- > <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a> > > I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the > Constitution which grant[s] a right to Congress of expending, on > objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents. > -- James Madison, 1794 > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@ntpsec.org > http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
