Richard Laager via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>: > Rather than debate hypotheticals further, I have submitted a merge > request to implement the "option H" idea being discussed: > https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/merge_requests/615 > > I'm looking for feedback on that particular merge request. Only the last > commit is particularly interesting, which addresses #414 by eliminating > wafhelpers/fix_python_config.py and making the utilities search > PYTHONDIR and PYTHONARCHDIR explicitly. > > The other, earlier commits are things I found while working on this. I > also submitted those separately as !614. That one should be > uncontroversial and ready for immediate merging.
I've merged #614. I'm still heads-down on the GCC repo move, but I'll
be watching the traffic on this over the next couple of days. I hope
we can reach a consensus before Christmas.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
