> I will audit them, but dropping this in the day before release doesn't just > seem like asking for trouble, it seems like screaming WE WANT TO EMBARRASS > OURSELVES.
Then put it on the known glitch list and fix it in 1.x > And I would so regard it if this were ever required on Linux or FreeBSD. I > have had no report of this. It's required on Fedora. I set it up ages ago. I think that was the recommended way back then. It worked. Nobody raised the issue so I never removed it. It kept on working. (Or maybe the word did go out and I missed it.) Fedora 26 [murray@hgm ~]$ printenv PYTHONPATH /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages [murray@hgm ~]$ ntpq --version ntpq ntpsec-0.9.7+1434 2017-09-24T02:08:48Z [murray@hgm ~]$ unset PYTHONPATH [murray@hgm ~]$ ntpq --version ntpq: can't find Python NTP library -- check PYTHONPATH. No module named ntp.control [murray@hgm ~]$ I get the same on FreeBSD. Should ntpq be able to print its version string without any libraries? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
