On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:38:57 -0500 Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 10:22:25 -0300, > Paulo César Pereira de Andrade > <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I had also switched back to yum in rawhide due to --skip-broken, > > and > >in a few updates not even needing it (I would first see what is > >broken, and if not something "vital", use --skip-broken), while dnf > >would just fail with cryptic messages. I can keep up if kde or gnome > >is broken, or some other stuff that does not prevent boot and a > >functional system. > > dnf really does need --skip-broken like support if it is to replace > yum. yum can be a lot faster than the needed work around to get dnf > to work equivalently. I am considering going back to yum in rawhide > rather than continuig to test dnf in rawhide because of this issue. dnf's default behavior is like yum with --skip-broken already. If thats not working and you need to find out more, add '--best' to see things without 'skip-broken'. If that still doesn't work, please file a bug. ;) kevin
pgprbNQUnKLK5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
