> > E.g. going after these: > http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/**f20-failed.html<http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f20-failed.html> > > Right now we have ~350+ broken packages, a lengthy series of broken deps, > an unknown amount of defacto unmaintained packages and an unknown amout of > maintainers having gone MIA. >
Agreed. > > What Infrastructure projects would be helped by this? >> > A web infrastructure to > * ease package orphanage. > * launch AWOL/MIA requests > * a unified koji/bodhi/bugzilla Web-GUI > You think BZ is slow now? > * much longer build.log holding time for FTBFS. > I think this comes down to the amount of storage it takes and the amount we have available. > > Also, > - faster builders: Introduction of the arm has significantly increased the > turn around times of package building. > - better mirroring: I am having the impression mirrormanager doesn't work > well at all. E.g. this morning, yum sent me around the globe for rawhide > and failed in the end, seemingly because all fast mirrors seem to be busy > loading f20. > TBF I don't believe this is anything to do with mirror manager at all, the fact is a lot of mirrors just don't hold rawhide or don't update it daily so they're at times out of date. Secondary arches have similar issues regarding those sorts of problems because there's a lot less mirrors of those. Peter
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
