On Mon, 22.07.13 16:04, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@mattdm.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 04:09:32PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> the problem i see is when things like MTA and rsyslog are
> >> removed from the defualt install many pakcgers will less
> >> care about them in the future nor test how well it works
> >
> > That's a separate issue. MTAs and syslog are going to be needed for many
> > very important use cases for years to come. That doesn't mean we need to
> > install them by default.
> 
> It's not really separate.
> 
> We don't have any canonical developer documentation that says what is
> or isn't a part of the OS, and "good" Linux applications are expected
> to use; we only have traditions, word of mouth, and de-facto
> standards. In this situation, what is or isn't enabled by default and
> shipped by default matters more than saying "are going to be needed
> for years to come" - the actions speak louder than the words.
> 
> Think of these debates as attempts to, after all the years, agree on
> and write down what the traditions and de-facto standards actually
> are.
>     Mirek

If you argue from the viewpoint of how universially available an API is
to make it "standard", then I would like to remind you that there are
probably more Ubuntu installations in the world thatn Fedora
installations, and they haven't included any MTA by default in 6 years
or so.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to