On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:59:19 +0100
Alec Leamas <leamas.a...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It might be that you are right, dunno, this is just so weird. My
> point is just that three simple reviews might be less work than to
> discuss this until there is a Proper Solution.

The guideline is: 

If the package is "Retired" in pkgdb, in general it needs a re-review.
(Sometimes exceptions are made right after the per cycle mass
retirement for things that were mistakenly retired, etc). 

If it's "Orphaned" you can just take ownership and go on. 

I'll look at fixing the wiki 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to