On 2012-11-07 16:53, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Alec Leamas <leamas.a...@gmail.com
<mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com>> wrote:
No top-posting in fedora-devel :)
Sorry :)
Besides that, I can just agree with Tim. The oldest package was
reviewed less than a year ago, the two others last summer.
Requiring a new review is, well, somewhat formal.
That said, it should be easy to review these to resolve this
issue. If you just make some new review requests, linking to the
previous review I'll guess this could be handled without to much
problems.
I don't see anywhere in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
That a new review is needed,
"Reviews are currently done for totally new packages, package renames
<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process#Re-review_required>,
and packages merged from the old Fedora Core repository."
I don't see this case, fits any of the cases.
Tim
It might be that you are right, dunno, this is just so weird. My point
is just that three simple reviews might be less work than to discuss
this until there is a Proper Solution.
--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
