Am 20.08.2011 20:49, schrieb Michał Piotrowski:
> 2011/8/20 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>:
>>
>> Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>>> On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>>>
>>>> WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares
>>>> about the beta-release called F15 GA any longer?
>>>>
>>>> F15 is SEVEN versions behind!
>>> Like most packages in Fedora systemd in released distributions is only
>>> updated when bugs need to be fixed. Feature additions are only done in
>>> the development version of Fedora.
>> the problem is that wat you call "as intedned", "a bug" and users call the 
>> same is
>> mostly a different thing, so if it was decided to include systemd in a way 
>> too few
>> state in systemd it should be mandatory that it will be optimized in the same
>> rlease and not a year later
> If you want a new features just build it or use F16 branch.
>
> Most F15 users don't want to deal with new systemd bugs in stable
> system.

jokingly?

nobody wanted a text-desert at boot
nobody wanted a "systemctl anything service" without feedback
nobody wanted a /sbin/service-wrapper which ALWAYS says OK even on fail
nobody wanted to fire up services with sockets after "systemctl stop 
something.service"
nobody wanted a bott with no progress while fs-check is active

if you release this crap way too soon in a production release you are 
responsible to
fix this bad attitudes in the same fedora-release or consider BEFORE the GA not 
spit
in the users face with making perfectly working things worser because YOU are
thinking that all is better (in theory)






Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to