On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 05:47:20PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, 4 Mar 2026 at 16:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Ah, so it'd be under a different package name. So I think retiring > > sigul itself is OK… I think I said this before, but anyway, if > > reviews are to be done, please assign them to me. > > I'm not sure it should yet be retired, that list of things to do > looked still pretty long to me, especially if some of it's awaiting > RFC ratification.
Yeah, but it's largely not too useful right now, since python-nss was retired so you need to find and build that before it can even be installed. We can keep it going in infra tags for our deployment until the replacement is there. It's definitely not great, but failing someone committing to maintaining python-nss I don't think we have many good options here. kevin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
