On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 10:38:44AM -0500, Jeremy Cline wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2026, at 10:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 11:21:50AM +0100, Miro Hrončok via devel-announce > > wrote: > >> Dear maintainers. > >> > >> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > >> packages > >> will be retired from rawhide in a week. > > > >> sigul kevin > > > > That seems bad. But it depends on python-nss which is no more. > > What's the plan here? > > The replacement[0] nearly has feature parity. There's a few things I need to > sort > out, like adding support to rpmsign for IMA signatures via PKCS#11[1] and > adjusting > or re-implementing robosignatory. I also hope to beg some folks for reviews > once > I've got documentation in order. > > There is also the small matter of Sequoia not having released with PKCS#11 > support. > I think it's all tied up to the PQC work and is waiting on RFC 9580 to be > accepted. > I believe it's possible, although I have not yet tested it, to get gpg > working with > keys in PKCS#11 so that might be a short-term solution. If that's the case we > might > be able to get a replacement deployed to the staging environment in a couple > weeks. > > [0] https://github.com/fedora-infra/siguldry/ > [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4125
Ah, so it'd be under a different package name. So I think retiring sigul itself is OK… I think I said this before, but anyway, if reviews are to be done, please assign them to me. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
