Il 07/11/25 14:44, Mark Wielaard ha scritto: > Hi Sam, > > On Sat, 2025-10-25 at 23:05 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> Jerry James writes: >> >>>> Just to make sure I was not seeing things, I immediately rebuilt the same >>>> package in mock in the F42 root, and find-debuginfo only needed a few >>>> seconds to take care of business. Instead of 8+ minutes. >>>> >>>> I'm curious if anyone else is also seeing this. >>> You might be seeing the behavior described in this thread: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/ >>> thread/6UELWQ55B4ADZMW2N7FGJ5BSIFBDIIDW/#RCE7SS2DR7H2WQECEY4UTICJ7CMYQD25 >>> >>> Does your package include static archives? >> Yes. So the capsule summary from there seems to be to add >> >> %undefine _preserve_static_debuginfo >> %define _find_debuginfo_opts --no-ar-files >> >> to the spec file. Hopefully, when this is no longer needed someone will send >> up the bat-signal. > In theory this is really only needed if your package contains lots of > (smaller) static archives. ar processing is still not super fast, but > we have set it up so that really large archives are skipped and any .a > files that aren't really archives that contain ELF objects are also not > touched. Maybe those heuristics aren't working correctly for your > package. Which one is it? I can take a look to see what seems to go on. > > Thanks, > > Mark
I've also experienced this with libindi package, if you want to take a look. Mattia -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
