So, some things I wonder about this process (in no particular order): If this lightweight process is easier, will not people just use it over the normal process? So, it will be harder to see who is completely unresponsive. There will be some of their packages with no one doing anything, and some with a co-maintainer that is doing all the work. ie, this process will be easier/better for particular maintainers, but might be less good for the distribution as a whole?
Might clarify what 'added as a co-maintainer' means specifically? ie, added as admin I assume since thats needed to do branches, or did you mean collaborator or committer? It would sure be nice if we could somehow automate things instead of depending on the requestor noting dates, etc (but thats a problem with the normal process too). Anyhow, I think it's worth trying and adjust if it seems like it's not working out. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
