On Mon, Apr 14, 2025, at 11:56 PM, Michel Lind wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Over the past months FESCo has been considering my proposal to have a
> lighter weight process to get needed changes for Fedora packages
> (whether getting a PR merged and built, or a package branched, etc.) -
> since the alternatives up to now is just pinging a PR or bugzilla
> issue, or escalating and getting the maintainer declared non
> responsive.
>
> We think we have a suggested process that would work well - thank you
> to everyone in the committee for their inputs - but would like to get
> community feedback on this, since we’re only human and there might be
> something we miss.
>
> Hopefully this balances out the need to get fixes in, with not
> bypassing maintainers’ concerns (or surprising them with a fait
> accompli if they’re on vacation, busy at a conference, etc.). But
> please chime in and let us know of any improvement we can make to this
> before it lands.

If I read the proposed process right the lightweight part of it is that this
process can/should be started before the "noticing that the maintainer is not
answering their bugs, etc". Is that what lightweight refers to here? There's
also less involvement from FESco so it might also refer to that? :)


My feeling is that if the written up process could do without much of the
process and instead have a written down process that expedites PR merges by
provenpackager(s) or FESco directly. Something akin to:

1. Day 0: open PR
2. Day 7: ping maintainer.
3. Day 14 (or 21): FESco issue to get PR merged.

Without taking on co-maintainer role. Though maybe that was probably
a conscious choice to have a barrier for using this process?

Simon
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to