On 2/28/25 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 08:56:33AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/13/25 3:32 AM, Clement Verna wrote:
>>  
>>> Given our experience running these tests, we would like to propose making 
>>> the coreos.cosa.build-and-testa required gate for package updates in 
>>> rawhide. We've already been successfully gating packages owned by the 
>>> Fedora CoreOS working group [3], and we'd like to extend this requirement 
>>> to the broader package set defined here [4].
> 
> I think the general response in the previous discussion was
> "cautious, but positive". Please just make a formal proposal (*)
> and let's move on with this.

> 
> Zbyszek
> 
> (*) FESCo would be one option. I don't think we have a more authoritative body
> specialized for QA. Or just open a pull request for the gating config. But
> I expect that that'd get bounced back to FESCo anyway, so it probably makes
> sense to do the PR and FESCo ticket in parallel.


Thanks! Will take this to FESCO.

Dusty
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to