On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 12:04 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > @Dusty Mabe <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com> , how about doing this for the F43 
> > development cycle? This give us a good way to "protect" to CoreOS builds as 
> > well as getting more data for turning on "real" gating as adamw mentioned.
> > When F43 branches from Rawhide we can then open a FESCO ticket to discuss 
> > enabling gating.
> 
> Indeed. I think it's a good first step. The only thing I don't like is having 
> to track
> somebody down to do the untagging. Maybe under a special request a few of us 
> could be
> given the powers to untag?

In practice how this generally works is "I file the ticket, then go to
the releng Matrix channel and poke Kevin about it. If Kevin's not
there, poke jnsamyak instead." Sometimes I do the poke before/while
filing the ticket. The ticket is important, though, to have a record of
the untag happening, *why* it happened, and ideally a note about the
followup ('we fixed this and a newer build is tagged now', or
whatever).

I don't know how mad Kevin will be if somebody else starts doing it
too, but you guys get along, right? :D

I kinda prefer having a check on my work to just doing it myself.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net




-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to