> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:40 AM Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek(a)redhat.com> > wrote: > > Except dnf5 broke a number of microdnf usecases with low memory where > microdnf worked [1]. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214520
Correct but as you can see the issue was not in DNF5 but in libsolv (solver for DNF, DNF5, zypper, PackageKit). Ales Matej from DNF team prepared two patches - one to resolve the issue in libsolv and second to enable workaround for DNF5. Thanks to better DNF5 structure we were able to discover the real cause of the issue. Therefore I am curios why the issue is mentioned here? Best regards Jaroslav _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
