> On 7/17/23 07:39, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> 
> Hi, I put more details in the fesco ticket: 
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3039#comment-864686 I believe these are 
> commonly known so I did not open any ticket against dnf5.
> 
> As said in the comment, I stopped putting effort into making dnf5 work 
> for our use case (which is provisioning of multiple distributions for 
> upstream PR CI via ansible), we would certainly hit more issues - or 
> unimplemented functionality if you want to sugar coat it - that would 
> require workarounds.

I have a great news dnf5-5.1.0-1.fc39 is in stable. The version 5.1 is the 
first version with stable API.

Best regards

Jarda
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to