On Wed, 25 May 2022 at 09:04, Jiri Vanek <jva...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 5/24/22 21:41, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 24/05/2022 21:00, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> I repeat what was told several times.We really do no t like this
> change, especially in its full sound of one static build repacked to all
> ive fedoras, but we have nto found a better way.
> >
> > 1. Stop doing TCK certification. Most Fedora OpenJDK users don't need
> certified binaries.
> We can not ship uncerified JDK. Sooner or later a swarm of lawyers would
> appear.
>
>
So could it be shipped instead as a icedtea?

The reason I am asking is that I think we need to look seriously at the
alternatives and see how much work the community is going to need to do.
1. Fedora no longer ships a trademarked 'coffee-themed language'. Instead
it adds an external repository where your team is able to focus on what
they can deliver.
2. Fedora no longer ships a trademarked 'coffee-themed language'. Instead,
a volunteer driven SIG puts in an icedtea back into into Fedora instead.
3. Fedora no longer ships a trademarked 'coffee-themed language'. Instead
people wanting it will need to find an external place which builds it.
4. Fedora ships a trademarked 'coffee-themed language' that is static.
However this doesn't decrease the workload enough and we need to move to
1-3 in 2 to 3 years.



> > All they need is a working and well packaged OpenJDK.
> >
>
>  From point of view of JDK, the jdk will remain working. From point of
> JDK  and generric java world the jdk will be even better.
>  From view of distributions standarts it will become weird misshape.
> Serving it purpose in build root well, serving as system or distribution
> jdk well. But yeah... all was said on this toppic already:(
>
> > 2. Reduce the number of OpenJDK branches in the repositories. I think
> the latest LTS version will be enough.
>
> I wish it is so simple. Please see my reply to Kevin when I enumerated,
> that we can not keep "jsut latest" lts.
> >
>
> --
> Jiri Vanek Mgr.
> Principal QA Software Engineer
> Red Hat Inc.
> +420 775 39 01 09
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>


-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to