On 5/24/22 18:37, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 24/05/2022 16:31, Jiri Vanek wrote:
The goal is to go as shim and cisco - to build in koji, certify, and repack.
shim and openh264 have a good reason for this - legal issues. OpenJDK doesn't.
Sorry, but I can't treat the laziness of the maintainers as a good reason.
Even if you woulf call 10 years of 5 engineers to keep dynamic builds (and
generlay jdk in Fedora) alivem, tt had become human-impossible to continue in
current way of things.
It will lead to lost of JDK or heavy rework of how JDK s handled now
I repeat what was told several times.We really do no t like this change,
especially in its full sound of one static build repacked to all ive fedoras,
but we have nto found a better way.
Really sorry,
J.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
