On 5/24/22 21:41, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 24/05/2022 21:00, Jiri Vanek wrote:
I repeat what was told several times.We really do no t like this change, 
especially in its full sound of one static build repacked to all ive fedoras, 
but we have nto found a better way.

1. Stop doing TCK certification. Most Fedora OpenJDK users don't need certified binaries.
We can not ship uncerified JDK. Sooner or later a swarm of lawyers would appear.

All they need is a working and well packaged OpenJDK.


From point of view of JDK, the jdk will remain working. From point of JDK  and 
generric java world the jdk will be even better.
From view of distributions standarts it will become weird misshape. Serving it 
purpose in build root well, serving as system or distribution jdk well. But 
yeah... all was said on this toppic already:(

2. Reduce the number of OpenJDK branches in the repositories. I think the 
latest LTS version will be enough.

I wish it is so simple. Please see my reply to Kevin when I enumerated, that we can not 
keep "jsut latest" lts.


--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to