> Am 25.05.2021 um 23:33 schrieb przemek klosowski via devel
> <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>:
>
>
>
> On 5/25/21 5:04 PM, Peter Boy wrote:
>>> So the same model works totally fine for both desktop and server.
>>>
>> I myself lack the exact technical knowledge, but (all?) server and file
>> system experts I hear consider just that a gross misconception.
>>
> I think you and Neal talk about two different things. The BTRFS proponents
> claim that the subvolume technology allows you to have flexible partitioning,
> so that you can dynamically create whatever partition layout is appropriate
> for your situation. Nobody is claiming that desktop partition scheme
> ('model') should be forced onto servers.
Yes, you are right. It’s not about the konkrete partition scheme but the
rationale behind it. As a server admin, I'm all about stability, taking
precautions in case of errors, recovery, less about flexibility. On my
workstation, flexibility is a high priority.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
