On 5/25/21 5:04 PM, Peter Boy wrote:
So the same model works totally fine for both desktop and server.
I myself lack the exact technical knowledge, but (all?) server and file system
experts I hear consider just that a gross misconception.
I think you and Neal talk about two different things. The BTRFS
proponents claim that the subvolume technology allows you to have
flexible partitioning, so that you can dynamically create whatever
partition layout is appropriate for your situation. Nobody is claiming
that desktop partition scheme ('model') should be forced onto servers.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
