On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote:
> On 06/20/2018 05:53 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > >> I believe we're missing something fundamental here. If a program/service >> etc. requires specific hardware to work >> and it can't gracefully handle situations where that hardware is not >> present - it shouldn't be a default. >> >> The way to handle this (and other similar situations) is to take away the >> default status until it can handle >> situations where the hardware doesn't exist. This is systems programming >> 101 - and frankly I am a >> bit surprised it's a matter of debate. >> > > There is a similar situation with other services, in particular the VM > support services. They are turned on by default, they would fail if not > running on the specific VM, but they are set to be conditional on being run > in that VM. I don't see how that is different than this case. > _______________________________________________ > I provided three examples, that caused systemd to report it was running in degraded mode. Would you care to provide a sample and the associated system error?
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CITDXD5UW6I5KQO4CIX5NAADQKYOYK4W/
