On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de> wrote:
> On Mi, 20.06.18 13:15, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > The proper behavior here would be for these services not to be marked as > > "failed" when the appropriate hardware is not present. When possible, we > > should be using systemd's Condition* features to skip attempting to start > > it at all, … > > Just to mention this: triggered by this mail I posted this PR: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/9360 > > This adds ConditionSecurity=uefi-secureboot, which could be nice and > accurate way to condition out that secureboot service. > > That said, it'll probably be a while before that propagates into > fedora. > > Lennart > Thanks... For mcelog and rngd if you don't want to rely on the fact the the cpu is AMD: mcelog has an option --is-cpu-supported and rngd has an option --list Either way, it's absolutely doable. No reason to burden users with misleading, unneeded error messages.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XMHZLZVLNJXZGTMOLELD6AZ2ZVIJHUBH/
