On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 09:29:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 08/22/2017 02:30 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2017-08-22, Honggang LI <ho...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41
> >> libibcm, libibumad, libibverbs, librdmacm and ibacm had been replaced by
> >> the new rdma-core package. Those five packages are sub-packages of the
> >> new rdma-core package.
> >>
> >> I had retired the f27 and rawhide branches of those five packages in
> >> last week. But the build...@fedoraproject.org keep sending messages to
> >> complain broken dependencies for those five packages.
> >>
> > The "fedgkg retire" tool is/was broken and could not perform a retirement
> > <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6212>.
> > 
> > Koji reports for ibacm source package:
> > 
> > $ koji list-pkgs --show-blocked --package=ibacm
> > Package                 Tag                     Extra Arches     Owner      
> >     
> > ----------------------- ----------------------- ---------------- 
> > ---------------
> > [...]
> > ibacm                   f27                                      releng     
> >      [BLOCKED]
> > ibacm                   f26-Alpha                                honli      
> >     
> > ibacm                   f26-Beta                                 honli      
> >     
> > ibacm                   f28                                      releng     
> >     
> > 
> > It means the package was not removed from Rawhide (f28) repositories.
> > 
> > If rerunning "fedpkg retire" does not help, you should file a ticket to
> > <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues> or
> > <https://pagure.io/releng/issues>.
> 
> Yeah, the retirement here seems to have only happened in f27.
> 
> I suspect this was right around branching time when you did this and
> something wasn't happy.
>

I will file tickets to retire those packages as "fedpkg retire" can't
retire them.

> In any case, due to the rdma-core not building on armv7, blocking these
> packages currently breaks composes. (Thats one reason why we have not
> had a branched compose in a while).
> 
> So, I would appreciate it if you could leave f28/rawhide for now (since
> we do get composes there) until we get lorax set to handle things.

No, we will *not* leave them for f28/rawhide or f27. With awilliam's and
kaleb's help, the packages depend on libibverbs had been rebuilt. I also
rebuilt five packages depend on libibumad. The rest of two packages, pcp
and papi will be rebuilt in today. Please see [1] for details.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484155

thanks
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to