On 08/22/2017 02:30 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-08-22, Honggang LI <ho...@redhat.com> wrote: >> hi, >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043#c41 >> libibcm, libibumad, libibverbs, librdmacm and ibacm had been replaced by >> the new rdma-core package. Those five packages are sub-packages of the >> new rdma-core package. >> >> I had retired the f27 and rawhide branches of those five packages in >> last week. But the build...@fedoraproject.org keep sending messages to >> complain broken dependencies for those five packages. >> > The "fedgkg retire" tool is/was broken and could not perform a retirement > <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6212>. > > Koji reports for ibacm source package: > > $ koji list-pkgs --show-blocked --package=ibacm > Package Tag Extra Arches Owner > > ----------------------- ----------------------- ---------------- > --------------- > [...] > ibacm f27 releng > [BLOCKED] > ibacm f26-Alpha honli > > ibacm f26-Beta honli > > ibacm f28 releng > > > It means the package was not removed from Rawhide (f28) repositories. > > If rerunning "fedpkg retire" does not help, you should file a ticket to > <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues> or > <https://pagure.io/releng/issues>.
Yeah, the retirement here seems to have only happened in f27. I suspect this was right around branching time when you did this and something wasn't happy. In any case, due to the rdma-core not building on armv7, blocking these packages currently breaks composes. (Thats one reason why we have not had a branched compose in a while). So, I would appreciate it if you could leave f28/rawhide for now (since we do get composes there) until we get lorax set to handle things. kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
