On 12/07/2016 05:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
More to the point: it is entirely awful for the quality of Fedora as a
whole if Rawhide is allowed to be completely broken for substantial
periods of time - and this *did* make Rawhide completely broken.
You may consider it awful, but it is necessary to allow development to be
done.
You keep making this point, but I haven't seen any explanation for it.
Why is it necessary to have Rawhide broken in order to do development?
Don't you develop locally and then push the result when it's functional?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
