On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:32 -0500, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > -1. Nay. NoWay. No thanks. Uh uh. > > I could find little or nothing in your proposal to which I agreed... so > decided not to quote any. > > I just registered at Fedoraforums.org and voted "adventurous" in > Adam's poll. Just to make sure my voice is heard, and not the > shouting of folks who think they know what I want, and want to limit > my choices for my own good.
As Matthew expressly said, "This is entirely orthogonal to the ongoing discussions regarding whether updates in stable releases should be expected to provide features or purely bugfixes" The proposal neither intentionally nor accidentally prevents people pushing 'adventurous' updates. It just requires that all updates receive a certain level of testing feedback to be accepted. You may still think it's a bad proposal, but it's important to note that it's not about restricting the types of updates that can be done. So voting in the poll I started doesn't have much to do with *this* proposal. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
