I have merged this one https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/5566

Hi Gerd
If you prefer that we move all TDX / SEV specific component to IntelTdx and 
AmdSev, I am OK with that.

Personally, I like your idea. Please submit Bugzilla and work on it, if you 
would like to.

Thank you
Yao, Jiewen


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 11:40 PM
> To: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Xu, Min M
> <min.m...@intel.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V1 0/5] Move Tdx specific lib from 
> SecurityPkg
> to OvmfPkg
> 
> Yeah, I also considered that before. But after look at current code 
> structure, I give
> up.
> 
> Since following SEV component are NOT in AmdSev directory (especially the TCG
> one), I do not see a strong reason to put them to IntelTdx dir.
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/tree/master/OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/tree/master/OvmfPkg/Tcg/TpmMmioSevDec
> ryptPei
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/tree/master/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncr
> yptSevLib
> 
> I think we can follow the existing code structure in this patch set.
> 
> Thank you
> Yao, Jiewen
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 6:16 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Xu, Min M <min.m...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>; Yao, Jiewen
> > <jiewen....@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V1 0/5] Move Tdx specific lib from 
> > SecurityPkg
> > to OvmfPkg
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 03:55:49PM +0800, Min Xu wrote:
> > > BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4752
> > >
> > > HashLibTdx and TdTcg2Dxe are designed for Intel TDX enlightened OVMF.
> > > They're more reasonable to be put in OvmfPkg than in SecurityPkg.
> > >
> > > SecTpmMeasurementLibTdx is not used anymore. So it is deleted in this
> > > patch-set.
> > >
> >
> > >  rename {SecurityPkg => OvmfPkg}/Library/HashLibTdx/HashLibTdx.c (100%)
> > >  rename {SecurityPkg => OvmfPkg}/Library/HashLibTdx/HashLibTdx.inf (100%)
> > >  rename {SecurityPkg => OvmfPkg}/Tcg/TdTcg2Dxe/MeasureBootPeCoff.c
> > (100%)
> > >  rename {SecurityPkg => OvmfPkg}/Tcg/TdTcg2Dxe/TdTcg2Dxe.c (100%)
> > >  rename {SecurityPkg => OvmfPkg}/Tcg/TdTcg2Dxe/TdTcg2Dxe.inf (100%)
> >
> > Better place them in OvmfPkg/IntelTdx ?
> >
> > Otherwise looks fine to me.
> >
> > take care,
> >   Gerd



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#117892): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/117892
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105531957/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to