With the commit message changed,

Reviewed-by: Marvin Häuser <[email protected]>

> On 27. Jan 2023, at 15:29, Pedro Falcato <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:02 AM Marvin Häuser <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 27. Jan 2023, at 10:29, Savva Mitrofanov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Missing comparison != 0 leads to broken logic condition.
>> 
>> The actual issue appears to be FeaturesCompat vs FeaturesRoCompat (latter is 
>> hidden by your usage of the macro). Checking for != 0 is redundant (albeit 
>> required by the code style guideline for non-functional reasons). Please 
>> confirm and update the commit message if you agree.
> 
> +1, the actual issue comes from using the wrong feature mask and not the != 0.
> If we get a v4, please update, else I can rewrite it myself.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <[email protected]>
> 
> -- 
> Pedro



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#99295): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/99295
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/96562691/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to