Hello Hao,
On 01/02/20 16:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/02/20 04:12, Wu, Hao A wrote:
>> Ray and Eric, thanks a lot for the review.
>>
>> Hello Laszlo,
>> It seems that you are out of office, I plan to push the series without your
>> comments first. If you have feedbacks/comments with regard to the series, I
>> will follow up for the potential refine/revert of the series.
>
> Just returned today. I'm now working to regain control of my mailbox.
>
> The above procedure works fine for me; in fact I would have suggested it
> myself. In case I encounter a regression with OVMF, I'll report it.
I've now run some regression tests [*], with OVMF built at commit
b948a496150f ("UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Pre-allocate PROCEDURE_TOKEN
buffer", 2020-01-02). At that stage, the tree contains your present
patch series too (which ends at commit fd30b0070773).
[*] Including, but a bit more than,
<https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/Testing-SMM-with-QEMU,-KVM-and-libvirt#tests-to-perform-in-the-installed-guest-fedora-26-guest>.
Basically my usual Linux guest tests.
I haven't noticed any regressions.
Thanks!
Laszlo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#52844): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/52844
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/69341881/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
