Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray...@intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Wu, Hao
> A
> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2019 8:49 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Ni,
> Ray <ray...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Zeng, Star
> <star.z...@intel.com>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan...@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael
> D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 0/6] Microcode related optimizations
> 
> Series is also available at:
> https://github.com/hwu25/edk2/tree/mpinitlib_opt_v5
> 
> V5 changes:
> A. For patch 2, address a typo to resolve enlarging the microcode patch
>    information buffer too early when it is not full;
> B. For patch 4, relocate the logic of storing detected microcode patch
>    before the application of microcode patch.
> 
> V4 history:
> A. For patch 2, keep the calling sequence of functions:
>    MicrocodeDetect() and MtrrGetAllMtrrs() unchanged for BSP.
> B. For patch 2, in function LoadMicrocodePatch(), add the missing logic
>    that handles the Extended Signature Table of a microcode patch.
> 
> 
> V3 history:
> For patch 3, correct license information for newly added header file.
> 
> V2 history:
> A. For patch 2, rename function parameters and variables to better reflect
>    their usage;
> B. For patch 2, remove unneeded check in LoadMicrocodePatchWorker();
> C. For patch 3, rename a couple of fields in the HOB structure;
> D. For patch 3, update the 'ProcessorSpecificPatchOffset' field to point
>    to the microcode patch header instead of microcode patch data;
> E. Add a new patch 5 to address an issue that certain fields in the
>    CPU_MP_DATA structure cannot be passed from PEI phase to DXE phase;
> F. Add a new patch 6 to remove the redundant microcode related fields in
>    the CPU_MP_DATA structure.
> 
> V1 history:
> This series will introduce a couple of optimizations to the MpInitLib with
> regard to microcode:
> 
> A. Reduce the copy size when loading the microcode patches data from flash
>    into memory;
> B. Produce a HOB to contain microcode patches information for subsequent
>    consumers of the microcode patches during the boot flow.
> 
> Uni-test done for the series:
> A. System boot to OS/Shell successfully on a real platform;
> B. Add debug message to verify the same microcode patch is applied to each
>    processor before and after the series.
> 
> 
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray...@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.z...@intel.com>
> Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan...@intel.com>
> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> 
> Hao A Wu (6):
>   UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Collect processors' CPUID & Platform ID info
>   UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Reduce the size when loading microcode patches
>   UefiCpuPkg: Add definitions for EDKII microcode patch HOB
>   UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Produce EDKII microcode patch HOB
>   UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate microcode patch fields in CPU_MP_DATA
>   UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Remove redundant microcode fields in
> CPU_MP_DATA
> 
>  UefiCpuPkg/UefiCpuPkg.dec                     |   3 +
>  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/PeiMpInitLib.inf |   1 +
>  UefiCpuPkg/Include/Guid/MicrocodePatchHob.h   |  44 +++
>  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h          |  59 +++-
>  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/Microcode.c      | 351 ++++++++++++++++++-
> -
>  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c          | 110 +++---
>  UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/PeiMpLib.c       |  55 +++
>  7 files changed, 513 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 UefiCpuPkg/Include/Guid/MicrocodePatchHob.h
> 
> --
> 2.12.0.windows.1
> 
> 
> 


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#52640): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/52640
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/69341881/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to