> On Jun 16, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Alan Carroll <solidwallofc...@yahoo-inc.com> > wrote: > > "This is not a reason to go nuts and use every damn C++11 and STL feature > there is" > > Exactly. One doesn't need a reason for that. > > Yes, I think we should move this up. Two feature at least that I think would > help making the code cleaner are "auto" and lambdas. For the latter there is > no shortage of tiny little classes that would be shorter and clearer with > lambda.
Rather than ad-hoc C++11 changes, we should target specific things we want, add it to the coding guidelines and use clang-modernize of clang-tidy to make the change if possible. I think nullptr, auto, and <atomic> are good candidates. J
