Hi, +1 for background_fetch. I have tested it and its working fine. It is very useful when the user request for large media files.
Regards, Randeep On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Sudheer Vinukonda <sudhe...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > We have been running the below *experimental* plugins in production, so, I > am +1 on promoting these to stable (some of this have already received +1 > votes, but, I am listing them anyway, to possibly make the vote stronger ;) > ): > > - regex_revalidate > - background_fetch > - buffer_upload > - esi > > Thanks, > > Sudheer > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Shu Kit Chan <chanshu...@gmail.com> > *To:* "dev@trafficserver.apache.org" <dev@trafficserver.apache.org> > *Cc:* "us...@trafficserver.apache.org" <us...@trafficserver.apache.org> > *Sent:* Friday, April 24, 2015 12:56 PM > *Subject:* Re: [v6.0.0] Experimental Plugins -> Stable > > That's true. Me and portl4t are still having plans for a few more > substantial additions to the plugin in the upcoming weeks. > > I do want to try making it to the "stable" for 6.0.0. Will work on those > additions soon and then shoot for sending an email out for a API review > with hopefully substantial enough time before 6.0.0 > > Another plugin I have is the ESI plugin. I think it is fairly stable, with > at least some usage. I do have a patch soon for a improvement to use the > streaming mode of the FetchSM. After that, there isn't other works planned > from my side. Thoughts on making this to the "stable"? > > Thanks. > > Kit > > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 24, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Jason J. W. Williams < > > jasonjwwilli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I personally would like to see ts_lua go stable. > > > > > > I think that’s up to Kit and the other people working on the plugin to > > decide. I sort of feel that it’s still changing enough that making it > > stable will make things much more difficult for them. But alas, I’m not a > > developer on this project. > > > > What I do feel strongly about though is that *before* we make the Lua > > plugin stable, we do a thorough API review of all the APIs that now would > > become frozen. This is a lot of work though, but needs to be done, before > > we commit to it being stable. > > > > Just my $.01, > > > > — leif > > > > > > > >> On Apr 24, 2015, at 7:18, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> Below is a list of currently “experimental” plugins. We should decide > > which, if any, of these should be moved to a stable state. Once stable, > > incompatible changes within a major release would not be accepted. Being > > stable also means that we expect it to be fully maintained and supported. > > >>> > > >>> Please discuss and suggest which of these should be promoted to > stable. > > >>> > > >>> — Leif > > >> > > >> These are the two I personally think we should seriously consider > > promoting. I use them daily, and I think they are generally used and > useful > > as well: > > >> > > >>> > > >>> authproxy/ > > >>> background_fetch/ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> — Leif > > >> > > > > > > > -- Randeep Mob: +919447831699[kerala] Mob: +919880050349[B'lore] http://twitter.com/Randeeppr http://in.linkedin.com/in/randeeppr [image: --] Randeep Raman [image: http://]about.me/Randeeppr <http://about.me/Randeeppr>
