> On Apr 24, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Bryan Call <bc...@apache.org> wrote: > > When do you think you will be open sourcing the plugin?
Hopefully for 6.0.0. We’ve worked with the IETF WG to get some things changed, and will continue to do so. I’d also encourage everyone who’s got use cases for URL signing to participate in this WG discussion. Cheers, — leif > > -Bryan > > > > >> On Apr 24, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org >> <mailto:zw...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 8:37 AM, Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org >>> <mailto:sor...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:18 AM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org >>> <mailto:zw...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org >>>>> <mailto:zw...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Below is a list of currently “experimental” plugins. We should decide >>>> which, if any, of these should be moved to a stable state. Once stable, >>>> incompatible changes within a major release would not be accepted. Being >>>> stable also means that we expect it to be fully maintained and supported. >>>>> >>>>> Please discuss and suggest which of these should be promoted to stable. >>>>> >>>>> — Leif >>>> >>>> These are the two I personally think we should seriously consider >>>> promoting. I use them daily, and I think they are generally used and useful >>>> as well: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> authproxy/ >>>>> background_fetch/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> — Leif >>>> >>>> >>> I'd like to nominate regex_revalidate, remap_stats, and url_sig. >> >> >> I’m a little bit on the edge with url_sig. We’re working on a plugin that >> implements the CDNI Signed URL spec, which I think is a nicer way to go >> forward. The specs from CDNI would not allow the “bit-field” features that >> url_sig has (yet at least). But I’d encourage people to look at the CDNI >> spec over e.g. url_sig or other custom made URL signing protocols. >> >> That much said, I’m merely -0 on promoting url_sig to stable, i.e. I’d >> prefer to see it deprecated over time, but I don’t care strongly. >> >> The CDNI specs are at >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-03 >> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cdni-uri-signing-03>. >> >> Cheers, >> >> — Leif >> >> >
