> On Apr 24, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Jason J. W. Williams > <jasonjwwilli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I personally would like to see ts_lua go stable.
I think that’s up to Kit and the other people working on the plugin to decide. I sort of feel that it’s still changing enough that making it stable will make things much more difficult for them. But alas, I’m not a developer on this project. What I do feel strongly about though is that *before* we make the Lua plugin stable, we do a thorough API review of all the APIs that now would become frozen. This is a lot of work though, but needs to be done, before we commit to it being stable. Just my $.01, — leif > >> On Apr 24, 2015, at 7:18, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Below is a list of currently “experimental” plugins. We should decide >>> which, if any, of these should be moved to a stable state. Once stable, >>> incompatible changes within a major release would not be accepted. Being >>> stable also means that we expect it to be fully maintained and supported. >>> >>> Please discuss and suggest which of these should be promoted to stable. >>> >>> — Leif >> >> These are the two I personally think we should seriously consider promoting. >> I use them daily, and I think they are generally used and useful as well: >> >>> >>> authproxy/ >>> background_fetch/ >> >> >> >> — Leif >>
