Totally right. Just checked the ts site now and saw the instructions are pointing to the svn readme. This is a good candidate for a wiki page.
I can put up a nice chart with the various operating systems i'll be checking with versions on that wiki. How far back do we want to go with distro releases? - Jason On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:56 PM, John Plevyak <jplev...@acm.org> wrote: > > I think a FAQ/Release nodes on the web site is the way > to go. There are bound to be a lot of weird system > compatibility issues when it goes into the wild and > it would be best to have them all in a single place that > we can update without changing the package. > > john > > > On 4/23/2010 10:49 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > On 04/23/2010 11:00 AM, John Plevyak wrote: > >> Here is my experience on a Ubuntu 8.04LTS (Hardy Heron) > >> on a clean VM. > >> > > > > Do we want to try to cover all this in the README / INSTALL documents > > for 2.0.x? The "trunk" has better versions of these documents, but I > > didn't want to backport that (since lots of other things have changed > too). > > > > Can we get away with documenting the install instructions on the Wiki > > (some of it is already there, might just have to be updated), and then > > make sure the INSTALL file on trunk reflects all the information from > > the Wiki? > > > > If not, we'll need to spend some time to update the INSTALL document for > > 2.0.x branch as well, and prepare a new package candidate. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > -- Leif > >
