JP,
This works for 9.10.
See my contrib scripts which are used for EC2. They should generally work
for dedicated, and at one time I did a test with 8.04. Can you double check
your recompile with these?
Note: I just checked hardy's package repo and libdb-dev and sqlite3-dev do
exist.
apt-get update
apt-get install -y g++ autoconf \
make \
libtool \
libssl-dev \
tcl-dev \
libexpat1-dev \
libdb-dev \
libpcre3-dev \
libsqlite3-dev \
libdb-dev
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, John Plevyak <jplev...@acm.org> wrote:
>
> Here is my experience on a Ubuntu 8.04LTS (Hardy Heron)
> on a clean VM.
>
> I needed to install libexpat1-dev instead of libexpat-dev
> (we could make a note in the README or online FAQ).
>
> I tried straight configure but it failed because sqlite
> on this version is 3.4.2 and sqlite3_open_v2 is not supported
> in that version. No package exists for sqlite3 3.5 for
> this version of the OS. The error message:
>
> configure: error: check for sqlite3 failed. Have you installed
> sqlite3-devel?
>
> was confusing since I did have sqlite3-devel installed.
>
> Given that SQLite is in the public domain
> we could just include the single file in the TS source
> tree and use that instead of making it a dependency.
>
> I tried:
>
> configure --without-sqlite3 --with-libdb
>
> which interestingly enough did not have a problem
> in configure, but reported:
>
> SimpleDBM.h:140: error: 'DEFAULT_DB_IMPLEMENTATION' was not declared in
> this scope
>
> During compile.
>
> I finally got it to work with:
>
> apt-get install libdb-dev
> configure --without-sqlite3 --with-libdb
>
> Again we might want to put in the README or online FAQ.
>
> I am not sure if any of these should be reported as bugs
> but I think there is room for improvement :)
>
> john
>
>
>
> On 4/22/2010 9:34 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've prepared a package (and sigs) for a 2.0.0 release candidate. Please
> > take a look at it, check STATUS/README/CHANGES, build and test it,
> > verify the sigs, basically, make sure it's a solid release candidate.
> > Since this is a 2.0.x release, only Linux is supported. When you are
> > done, cast your +/-/0 votes, I'm aiming for a release on 4/28/2010,
> > assuming no issues are found.
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/
> >
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 2851995 Apr 23 04:22
> > trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 836 Apr 23 04:22
> > trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2.asc
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 62 Apr 23 04:22
> > trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2.md5
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 70 Apr 23 04:22
> > trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2.sha1
> >
> > SHA1: c5625a55fd3ca30a7a915aa8ead76f7e1b2624ab
> trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2
> > MD5: a271265c430c1f1e51a91f280fa4513c trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -- leif
>
>
