Okay tested pkg sigs and TS on Ubuntu 9.04 and no issues. +1 for this latest RC. -George
On 4/23/10 8:06 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 04/23/2010 07:38 PM, John Plevyak wrote: >> >> Regarding the copyright change. Since the code >> didn't change if we need the copyright changes then >> we should just be able to rebuild the package and release >> if we get the vote. >> > > A new set of files are on > > http://people.apache.org/~zwoop/ > > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 70 Apr 24 02:53 > trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2.sha1 > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 62 Apr 24 02:53 > trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2.md5 > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 2852645 Apr 24 02:53 > trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 zwoop zwoop 836 Apr 24 02:53 > trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2.asc > > > Checksums: > > MD5: 4c000131b19bdda05f1f21c6ae0547af trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2 > SHA1: 45b4a0b1e8f2917a1b0ee972ed214daf4d946309 > trafficserver-2.0.0.tar.bz2 > > > These packages should include John's changes (please verify), and I also > added a link to the "Build" on the CWiki to the INSTALL file. > > Consider this the new candidate, there should be no other changes than > those mentioned. > > -- leif > > P.s > > These are the two merged changesets from 2.0.x that are in this new > release candidate: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=937578&view=rev > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=937581&view=rev > > Note: the 2.0.0 release candidate is built off tags/2.0.0 in SVN, which > is why I had to merge these two changes on to that tag. I know it might > be frowned upon to merge onto a tag, but until we have the candidate > frozen, it's easier to just merge any 2.0.x branch changes onto the > 2.0.0 tag (this is actually a feature I like in SVN). If someone feels > strongly about that, and suggest we make another tag in a situation like > this, just suggest such a "rule". > > Of course, once 2.0.0 is released, the 2.0.0 tag should be considered > untouchable. Is there a way to make it read-only? :)
