There's been comparison between gnu awk, p9p awk and bwk's one true awk. http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1008/5479.html > Maybe I'll add an entry on http://core.suckless.org about awk Maybe also remove awk from the TODO of sbase?
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 9:19 AM, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:06:05 -0200 > Alba Pompeo <albapom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey Alba, > >> I understood that sbase would create its own awk and ignore OTA. But >> the idea is to not have an awk and just point to OTA? Just like >> there's no sh and suckless just points to mksh? This is what I was >> suggesting from the start, so if this is the case I'm regret the >> confusion. > > toybox and busybox ship their own sh's. It's extremely irresponsible, > considering that toybox is only maintained by 1 person. > One always has to keep in mind how many people can effectively work > on a project and keep track of bugs and other problems. > mksh is an excellent choice for a shell, and there are enough awk > implementations around. > Maybe I'll add an entry on http://core.suckless.org about awk, as I > already recommend a sh there. Which one would you guys suggest? > > Cheers > > FRIGN > > -- > FRIGN <d...@frign.de> >
