On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:06:05 -0200 Alba Pompeo <albapom...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Alba, > I understood that sbase would create its own awk and ignore OTA. But > the idea is to not have an awk and just point to OTA? Just like > there's no sh and suckless just points to mksh? This is what I was > suggesting from the start, so if this is the case I'm regret the > confusion. toybox and busybox ship their own sh's. It's extremely irresponsible, considering that toybox is only maintained by 1 person. One always has to keep in mind how many people can effectively work on a project and keep track of bugs and other problems. mksh is an excellent choice for a shell, and there are enough awk implementations around. Maybe I'll add an entry on http://core.suckless.org about awk, as I already recommend a sh there. Which one would you guys suggest? Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
