On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Alexander Huemer <alexander.hue...@xx.vu> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 01:23:46PM -0400, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote: >> Who are we talking about? *I* use free software. Despite that, I can't >> fully trust what my computer is doing, because I can't verify the >> hardware the software runs on isn't doing something malicious. I also >> can't verify that my hardware isn't emitting signals that some >> malicious person is picking up via some sort of device >> [https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/sec09/tech/full_papers/vuagnoux.pdf >> and others], nor can I easily verify that a TLS key that I'm >> protecting my connection with isn't extremely weak, and in otherwords, >> my communication is actually completely insecure. Nor, can I assume, >> in this day and age, that there aren't a crap ton of other errors in >> the TLS protocol, or bugs (keep in mind this is in free software >> implementations) in the implementations that make me no more unsafe >> than running blobs. >> >> So, yeah, I can verify the software, perhaps, but that doesn't really >> make me safe. > > Access to the source code of the software you are running is necessary > but not sufficient[1]. As simple as that. > What is your point here? Since you can't be sure about all details you > give a flying fuck about _everything_ and use non-open-source software? > You can't be serious.
Did I say that I use non-free software? I didn't. I suggested exactly what you said, that it's not sufficient by itself. Put it this way. If you've got a target on your back, you're fucked. Free software or not. >>> People have hired me in the past because of the look of desktop, yes. > >> That's insane and stupid, and you should have declined the offer due >> to their idiocy! Any moron can learn to customize the way their >> desktop looks. > > Well, I oversimplified, you know that. I'm certain you're being serious. >> And no, I don't develop web applications with ruby and javascript. > >>> Me either, but lots of other (some of them are even very >>> intelligent!) people *do.* Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. > > I just don't care about them. Awwww. I'm sure "they" are very sad. Have a nice day! Hugs and kisses, Andrew