On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:04 PM, "Köhring, Norman" <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought we already skipped the intermediate bytes? Is there any worth having > them? Also, regarding the magic number: Image is a very common description. We > could also think about words like “picture” (or “pic”) or use some > abbreviation > of “simple image format”: SIF or SIMG? > > The format could look like MAGIC FORMAT WIDTH HEIGHT DATA. That results in for > example: > SIMGRGBA0000160000000900[data]
... .SLG?
