On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:27:45 -0400 Charlie Murphy <cmsmur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> * imgRGBA (from Norman Koehring's script) > * imageRGBA (exactly 10 bytes) > * img16widhei8rgba (doesn't make sense for ASCII header) > * imagefile (doesn't hint about file contents) I personally like imgRGBA and imageRGBA, but there needs to be a hint that width and height are specified. Given I'm busy until saturday-noon, I won't be able to put my whole capacity on this. On Saturday though, I can really spend a lot of time on this topic (and I'm looking forward to it). Basically speaking, I'm now more of a fan of storing the width and height in binary form (16 or 32 bit) instead of ASCII. "imagefile" is also very nice. We really need to reflect on that. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
