On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Martti Kühne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:14 PM, FRIGN <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:04:17 +0200 (CEST) >> "Köhring, Norman" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I thought we already skipped the intermediate bytes? Is there any worth >>> having >>> them? >> >> No. I assumed we also already ditched the ASCII-approach and went for >> binary-16 or 32-bit-BE-integers >> > > Let's just disagree. Let's build a meta image framework in python that > creates the format code you like. >
Seriously. Enabling end users to create their own image formats they want is a whole new scope we haven't considered yet. We just need an image format specification server somewhere which provides a webservice from where you could download the image decoding code. The same thing is done with gpg keys already, so we could integrate gpg keyservers into the whole process... cheers! mar77i
