On July 13, 2014 5:50:44 PM EEST, Rafa Garcia Gallego <rafael.garcia.gall...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Dimitris Zervas <dzer...@dzervas.gr> >wrote: >>>Great work! I found a couple of bugs, but they should be easy to fix. >> Add a comment to be able to track them > >'m', 'n' and 'N' were not working in command mode (the Arg was 0 so it >was starting a sequence). I fixed it by creating a stub m_adjective >and checking for it in code. I pushed that and a couple of extra >bindings. Ah, good one. But, there is a difference between a S_Sentence and a S_Parameter. a sentence executes the verb with the adj's arg. a parameter executes the verb with a .v arg same with tge pressed character. I implemented parameter mode to make multiple marks work. So, i'll rename m_adjective to m_sentence and create a new m_parameter
>The way of chaining commands if the test pointers for n+1 match is >brilliant. We need a way to execute those *after* the adjective >returns so we can easily implement 'y' and 'c'. We can add a checker. For ex. if .i == 1, as a verb's parameters are completely useless. if the checker successes, and the tests are the same, carry on executing. >> Could I have write access to sandy? > >Right now I don't have write access to suckless.org either. IMO you >can have it, but it's up to the suckless.org gods really. > >In the meantime I added you to my own bitbucket remote. Thank you :)
